Global Voices – Tomislav Jovanovski from Southeast Europe

[This text is part of a series of essays that were sent to us by young writers from across the globe on how they see Europe and its future. More essays will be published over time.]

[I want] to point out that we are [a] sustainable and natural part of EUROPE and that is [my] standing point to start with. SEE (Southeast Europe) as [a] region has political ties [with Europe] (some countries are EU/NATO member states, some are heading in that direction), as well as economic relations [that show] which countries in the world are [the] biggest importers of the goods and services that are manufactured by factories placed in SEE. [T]he answers is: [the] most developed countries [in the EU].

Furthermore, [many examples show] that we are culturally connected. All together, we can contribute to the process of EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, [to a] EUROPE based on differences, but also [to a] modern EUROPE [that sets an example by showing] how countries can [take] part [in a] reconciliation process and [be] driving force[s] of joint political and economic projects for [a] better future: [a future] where ideas, [the] movement of people, and trade (including services) are based on certain legal rules and requirements [that are] fair and equal for all, for states, for companies, for individuals…

It is fairly [clear] that [the EU’s] model of integration can be [seen] as [an] exampl[e of] where [the] SEE [is] head[ing] in [the] near and distant future (30 years?), [and how it is getting there. (Even though this model cannot just be “copy-pasted”.)] [W]ith our values ([which are] based on [our] traditional role in the past) [the] SEE can contribute to the bigger picture: [The SEE can contribute to a] EUROPE [that stretches] from [the] Atlantic (Portugal) to [the] Ural[s] and beyond. [It can help make the EU have a] greater role in the geo-spatial concept of Eurasia.

SEE has to [be] embedded [in] the democratic norms [of the] developed countries [of] the [W]est. [It has] to cooperate with its European neighbors in [the northern] and central regions of the continent. [It must] implement [the] best practices when it [comes to] human rights and gender- and minority issues. [And it has] to further improve its [ways of dealing with] reform-judicial and eco-social aspects of [the] daily li[fe] of [its] citizens. [There is a p]otential in terms of resources here, [except for when it comes to] the most precious resource: human capital. [P]eople come and go all [over] Europe. [I]t is [an] open space without borders, but SEE politicians, as well [as communities], should [generally] take in[to] consideration that if SEE wants to play [a] comprehensive and relevant role in the theatre called “EUROPE”, [they] should deliver results and display alternative[s] (economical, cultural and visionary) to [the] people that are willing to [let Europe stretch] further than SEE. [They] should foster [the] inclusion of minorities [and a] greater cooperation within the community, and [they should create] clear perspective[s] for [the] youth. [They should get young people involved in] SMEs [(small and medium-sized enterprises), which create] business opportunities and social entrepreneur[ship]. [This] is the future not only for SEE as [a] region, but [for all of] Europe.

SEE has its advantages. [It might] be threatened by certain historical legacies, but in the past [it has also] been seen as a gate toward[s the W]est ([opening up towards] external influences). A gate that [is] now open [as well as] displaced. [Through] civil societ[y], SEE has [the opportunity] to be[come a] relevant stakeholder in the process of defining EUROPE (and [the] EU as [a] supranational [institution] or [a] club of Nation member states). Furthermore, with [the] advance[d] technological evolution, [it could become a relevant stakeholder] in the project of globalization.

Is [this] difficult? No, BUT it [takes] courage and political will, as well [as] experience, charisma and [a] vision for the future: [More specifically, a vision of] our joint future.

“CULTURE IS EVERYTHING” – Gerstner

Tomislav Jovanovski from Southeast Europe

23/6 2017

[edits: Louise Roesen Abildgaard]

 

Global Voices – Anastasiya Blazhko from Ukraine

[This text is part of a series of essays that were sent to us by young writers from across the globe on how they see Europe and its future. More essays will be published over time.]

“So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth” -Baha’u’llah

      If [a] human being completely unfamiliar with world history looked at the way Europe is functioning today he would probably be more than a little confused. How could it happen that [in] such a small territory, so many unique, independent nationalities somehow appeared? And with worldviews and traditions that are so different from each other, how were they able to unite under one flag in the name of peace and Human Rights protection?

I grew up in the country that has the most controversial position in the European arena. Ukraine is often [referred to as] the bridge between the European world and the post-Soviet states. Our country has been trying to create a new vision of Ukraine in order to bring back the values of our European past and transform the “not-so-great” experience we had with [the] communist government. Not having a clear vision of the future we want to live in is the main problem of the people of our nation. Most of them, especially elderly people, are still living in the past, forgetting the present.

In 2014 during the Revolution of Dignity, the people of our nation finally decided whether they wanted to [be] a Western border of the post-Soviet community or [to be] one of the European nations. This year I [got] the chance to study at the Ukrainian Leadership Academy, a project that [aims] at creating a new generation of leaders who will be able to bring our country to a whole new level of development and [improve the] quality of human life. The main idea of this project is that every choice you make should be supported by the values you believe in. And I guess [that] is my main point here: We can only talk about our future in 30 years, if we believe that we will be able to get there.

I don’t believe that in our globalized world we can talk about [the] scenarios of different countries separately. For the past 50 years, thanks to the invention of television and the internet, we became so united that we [now] move forward as one organism. [This] means that it’s up to each one of us [to decide] how our countries are going to communicate in the future.

The main challenge [that the] European community [is facing] today is finding the balance between democratic and traditional values. Changes can often seem scary, especially for us Europeans, who tend to be conservative about certain things. If it is accepted by people that [global] issues are not just [a certain] “world’s” concerns anymore we will be able to move to the next step of human progress. [For some reason] the natural greediness and the non-acceptance of people with other religious beliefs [result in the creation of] a great war on our way there.

Even though Europe [as a whole] was built [upon] Christian values it can’t stay [purely] Christian anymore. We can’t just close our eyes on the events that are happening outside [of] Europe.

I dream to see [a] future [version of] Europe [which is a] union of countries that focus[ses] first of all on [the] human itself [and] that put[s] all stereotypes [in] the far background. It is easy to shut yourself in your house not seeing the fire at your neighbor’s house but we shouldn’t forget that fire tend[s] to spread really fast. Only together Europe can be strong. Our open hearts should be [the] main weapon to defeat our main enemy: Indifference.
I want to finish with a famous quote by Winston Churchill: “We hope to see a Europe where men of every country will think of being a European as of belonging to their native land, and…wherever they go in this wide domain…will truly feel, ‘Here I am at home.”

Anastasiya Blazhko from Ukraine

20/4 2017

[edits: Louise Roesen Abildgaard]

The future of transportation

Narrative 2 – Copenhagen Edition

At our Copenhagen workshop, global warming and pollution were brought up as some of the major issues that we have to find solutions for in the future. So one group sat down to discuss it.

While acknowledging that there are numerous sources of pollution that need to be dealt with (agriculture for one), the group decided to mainly focus on means of transportation.

One Globe

The group envisioned a future where people are even more connected than they are today, so they named their fictional newspaper “One Globe”. In the future, knowledge about sustainability should be shared more efficiently across borders. Besides, it should be even easier to travel between different countries, experience different cultures and learn from them. This is necessary in order to overcome today’s dangerous tendencies of fearing the “other”, to turn this fear into knowledge, and to create a sense of global solidarity.

But while the benefits of increased connectivity were clear to the group, there seemed to be a backside to the story: While increased connectivity might result in increased openmindedness, cultural understanding etc., wouldn’t increased travelling also surely result in more pollution?

How to be more connected while reducing pollution

Air travel has become the easiest and cheapest means of transportation within Europe – but travelling by train is less pollutive. The fictional newspaper therefore announced the happy event of the very last polluting airplane taking off! Unless that means we found a way to create non-polluting airplanes, it means aviation has been replaced by the less-polluting transportation by train.

In order for trains to become the main means of transportation in the future, the group envisioned two new inventions:

Firstly, apart from having developed less pollutive trains, we will have developed trains that can travel underground at the speed of light!

Secondly, we will have created an efficient Pan-European railway system! By implementing a system that works at the same (high) standard all over Europe, travelling becomes easier and an equal option for all Europeans.

 

 

Remembrance – in a not so distant future!

Narrative 1 – Copenhagen Edition

During our Copenhagen workshop in June, one group discussed the importance of remembrance in the future: How might we remember and learn from the terrible capacities of humankind better than we do now?

The discussions went far and above and resulted in a two-page fictional newspaper called “Diversity Daily”. The ideas for solutions that the group came up with turned out to be more graspable and realistic than what could have been expected!  “Diversity Daily” presented the following ideas:

A new way of recounting history: the untold stories

In order to avoid forgetting and neglecting parts of history, the group discussed how a new form of recounting history is needed.

One of the fictional articles announced the opening of a New Museum of European History. The national museums of all countries lay out slightly different versions of history, because the telling of history is connected to national identity. An European Museum already exists in Brussels, but the idea of the group was not to have a museum about European institutions etc. This new museum should not only convey the common European values, but instead mainly focus on the different perspectives that one can have. It should tell a story – using the latest museological inventions in visuals, interactiveness etc. – but still clearly state that it is aware of doing so. It should not attempt to convey an absolute truth.

The museum should focus on narratives and real life stories from all over Europe. The importance of this is also what the fictional article “My grandfather was a fireman during WW2” tries to point out. Maybe even a regular man doing his regular job during WW2 could reveal some interesting knowledge!

Researching and sharing knowledge

Many of the fictional articles of “Diversity Daily” underline the importance of constantly attempting to gain new knowledge as well as the importance of sharing this knowledge.

Pointing towards things that are already currently happening, the newspaper mentions several initiatives, which should be sustained and even more widespread in order to avoid forgetting/neglecting: student-teacher exchanges, new ground breaking studies and conferences for students, academics and interest groups from several European nations (e.g. meeting to discuss different cases of persecution and genocide).

In the future, new technology should support this purpose, and who knows what kind of possibilites might exist then? As an example the group presented this idea: “New Open Acess Lexicon of World History published by historians from all over Europe includes free downloadable app that tells histories of Europe’s regions – with interactive map!”

Pan-European Memory Day

The final idea of the group was this: Having a pan-European memory day for victims of persecution and genocide. The immense effect that tradition with its wide net of symbols, songs etc. can have, should not be undermined. By celebrating a onesided version of history, you end up forgetting things that do not fit into the story. But that does not mean that telling a story in general is wrong (or even avoidable). The important thing is what we choose to commemorate. Commemorating the victims of persecution and genocide collectively all over Europe might be an effective way to make people feel more connected. And of course to make them remember and learn from the horrors of history.

Next up: Copenhagen on June 24th!

Sign up here: https://www.facebook.com/events/1897282887214637/

Our next event is in Copenhagen on June 24th, and we would love to see you there!

Are you sick of hearing about Trump, Brexit and Le Pen? Are you tired of gloomy visions about the end of democracy, “European values” or even the entire West? So are we!

We find it much more interesting to ask: How would it look if everything turned out fine after all? For us and for the world in general? How could alternatives to these dark visions look?

In this half-day workshop we explore the questions: Which future do we actually want to live in? What do we want for our family, friends, city and Europe in the future? What do we dream about when we think about the day after tomorrow?

Please come join us in developing future visions that encourage reflection and the desire to work together for a better world of tomorrow.

The event will take place in the centre of the city and there will be free snacks and drinks. There is no entrance fee.

Sign up for the event here: https://www.facebook.com/events/1897282887214637/

Life in Optimism

 Narrative 2 – Cologne Workshop

The second narrative developed in our first Cologne-based Futures of Europe event followed a consciously optimistic view of the future:

It imagines a world in which the science-scepticism of the early 21st century has been overcome as a globalized humanity realized that its only realistic path towards a prosperous future was a shared, scientifically literate one.

Representing this, a successor to the United Nations – or reformed UN – plays a key role in shaping the destinies of the planet’s inhabitants. Moving beyond the post-World War II roles of regional powers in bodies such as the Security Council, this new World Government truly does embody the geographical makeup of the population. To symbolize this, the Government is nomadic in nature, making only months-long stops in individual locations before moving on to allow for all its citizens to have equal access to their elected leaders. This modus operandi for any modern legislative body is dependent of and first enabled by technological progress that allows for the mobility and transportability of staff and infrastructure while reducing the environmental, social and political costs to a minimum.
Similarly, this future imagines a humanity that has moved beyond ‘single planet status’ and started to colonize and make use of the solar system, investing in its exploration for scientific discoveries and natural resources, replacing the need to further exhaust the already strained resources on planet Earth.

In this futures newspaper (dated: 26/04/2047), the following major headlines could be found:
– The last gasoline-powered car has been retired was put into the newly founded “Museum of Outdated Technologies” in Nairobi, Kenya – marking one more symbolic step away from the industries and thinking on the 20th century.
– The first gubernatorial elections on Mars have successfully concluded with a win from Earth-born Frank March for the Mars Citizens Initiative, marking both a milestone for the planet’s 50.000 colonists – and likely one of the last earth-born representatives of the red planet.
– New Life forms have been found in the sub-surface ocean of Jupiter’s moon Ganymede, report scientists based in the research outpost on the moon’s surface – the creatures are said to be highly adapted to life in the lightless depths of their environments. First images are expected to be de-classified by the end of the week.
– Jon Jhons is the first post-gendered person to be elected both Mr and Ms Universe, tearing down one more barrier of heteronormative thinking.

The Global Citizen

Narrative 1 – Cologne Workshop

What should be simple in the future and what shouldn’t?

This question became the point of departure for one of the four narratives that were created at the Cologne-workshop.

Even though it contains the word “simple”, the question far from was. Many different wide-ranging topics were discussed, mostly resulting in quite ambigous conclusions. In the end, however, the group was able to come up with three different concrete newspaper sections, which illustrated their main points:

Global exchange of knowledge

The first newspaper section was an article about German students going to Congo to learn about their new mobile phone technologies and exchange knowledge.

International relations should be complex in the sense of connecting the whole world and profiting from the possibilities created by globalisation. We should profit from each other’s different complex value- and knowledge systems. On the other hand, International relations should be “simple” in the sense that they should be based on humanity, solidarity and equality.

Citizen’s initiatives

The second section was an article about how a local citizen’s initiative had managed to completely abolish food waste in their city.

In the future, more problems should be solved by more direct (/simpler) volunteer initiatives. The citizens should feel connected to their neighborhoods and thus responsible for finding solutions to local and even global issues. Additionally, innovative solutions should be cherished and encouraged.

A complex but honest public debate

The last newspaper section was a debate section, where politicians clearly and honestly expressed their varied opinions on a subject.

Public debate should not be dominated by over-simplified arguments, and it should not depend on complex hidden political strategies. Instead it should be dominated by complex, honest and clear representations of opinions.